FORTUNE CREDIT CAPITAL LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED) vs BHAGIRATHI METAL — EXA/911/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020250712023

Filing Number

EXA/25062/2023

Filing Date

07-Sep-2023

Registration No

EXA/911/2024

Registration Date

19-Apr-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FORTUNE CREDIT CAPITAL LTD ( FORMERLY KNOWN AS UNITED PETRO FINANCE LIMITED)

    Adv. GaneshDhonde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHAGIRATHI METAL

  2. 2.NARENDRA B RAJPUT

  3. 3.KIRAN B RAJPUT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in cases where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 07-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/911/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in cases where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was an express written agreement waiving the objection under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case