M/S. PRIME ARCADE PVT. LTD. vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 7 ORS Advocate - Minal Vijay Chavan, RES NO. 6,GP OS,RES NO 01,Ritesh Kishormal Jain,RESP NO.7,Vijay D Patil,RESP NO.2 TO 4 — WP/44/2017
Case under Mah. Slum Areas Act. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 27th April 2018.
CNR: HCBM020250122016
Next Hearing
10th October 2016
Filing Number
WP/2627/2016
Filing Date
01-10-2016
Registration No
WP/44/2017
Registration Date
06-01-2017
Judge
REGISTRY DISPOSAL (OS)
Coram
REGISTRY DISPOSAL (OS)
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
27th April 2018
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S. PRIME ARCADE PVT. LTD.
Adv. Chandrakant N Gole
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND 7 ORS Advocate - Minal Vijay Chavan, RES NO. 6,GP OS,RES NO 01,Ritesh Kishormal Jain,RESP NO.7,Vijay D Patil,RESP NO.2 TO 4
SLUM REHABLITATION AUTHORITY
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE ASST. REGISTRAR, C. S.
THE ASST. MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER
SHREE GANESH CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED)
HERAMB CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY (PROPOSED)
THE HIGH POWER COMMITTEE
Hearing History
Judge: REGISTRY DISPOSAL (OS)
FOR PRODUCTION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR PRODUCTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-10-2016 | FOR PRODUCTION |
| 02-12-2020 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 19-04-2018 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 12-04-2018 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 12-01-2018 | FOR PRODUCTION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/s. Prime Arcade Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which the court granted, noting that the petition had already been disposed of with compliance recorded, and directed that it not be relisted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by M/s. Prime Arcade Pvt. Ltd. against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, which the court granted, noting that the petition had already been disposed of with compliance recorded, and directed that it not be relisted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts