FORTUNE CREDIT CAPITAL LTD vs AMBIKA LAMINATES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR VISAN J PATEL — EXA/2279/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020249982023

Filing Number

EXA/24990/2023

Filing Date

07-Sep-2023

Registration No

EXA/2279/2024

Registration Date

28-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FORTUNE CREDIT CAPITAL LTD

    Adv. GaneshDhonde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMBIKA LAMINATES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR MR VISAN J PATEL

  2. 2.VISAN J PATEL

  3. 3.URMILA VISAN PATEL

  4. 4.JESHABHAI DEVRAJ PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, while allowing relief only if parties had executed written agreements waiving the ineligibility objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 07-Sep-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2279/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator appointments were unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, while allowing relief only if parties had executed written agreements waiving the ineligibility objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case