NIRMAL HARDAYAL VAZIRANI vs SMT. GOMTI HARDAYAL VAZIRANI (DECEASED) — TP/41/2006

Case under Indian Succession Act. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 31st August 2007.

Case disposed Next hearing 31-Aug-2007

CNR: HCBM020248122005

Filing Number

TP/1014/2005

Filing Date

19-Dec-2005

Registration No

TP/41/2006

Registration Date

16-Jan-2006

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Vazifdar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice S.J. Vazifdar

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

31-Aug-2007

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRMAL HARDAYAL VAZIRANI

    Adv. Advocate- ,Kanchan Pamnani

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SMT. GOMTI HARDAYAL VAZIRANI (DECEASED)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Mrs. Kavita Y. Ambekar, Company Registrar/Testamentary RegistrarView PDF

    The court granted the probate petition filed by Nirmal Hardayal Vazirani as executor of the deceased Gomti Hardayal Vazirani's will executed in 1996, after finding that all legal formalities were complied with, the caveat filed by another heir (Ram Vazirani) had been discharged, and all legal heirs were properly served. The Testamentary Registrar directed the office to issue probate subject to filing of the advocate's Vakalatnama and verification that no cross-petition or fresh caveat is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Dec-2013

    For Pronouncement Of Judgement [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka

  4. 31-Aug-2007

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Dec-2005

    Case filed

    Registration No. TP/41/2006

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted the probate petition filed by Nirmal Hardayal Vazirani as executor of the deceased Gomti Hardayal Vazirani's will executed in 1996, after finding that all legal formalities were complied with, the caveat filed by another heir (Ram Vazirani) had been discharged, and all legal heirs were properly served. The Testamentary Registrar directed the office to issue probate subject to filing of the advocate's Vakalatnama and verification that no cross-petition or fresh caveat is pending. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case