AMBIT FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED vs NIMANTRAN AGENCIES — EXA/2827/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM020245702023
Filing Number
EXA/24562/2023
Filing Date
02-Sep-2023
Registration No
EXA/2827/2024
Registration Date
23-Oct-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 10-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMBIT FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. Sandeep D Rankhambe,Santosh Jawale,Santosh Jawale, ,Santosh Jawale
Respondent(s)
-
1.NIMANTRAN AGENCIES
-
2.NIRAV HIRALAL SANGHVI
-
3.PALLAVI NIRAV SANGHAVI
-
4.HIRALAL DEVCHAND SANGHVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside all arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the period of the prior invalid proceedings from limitation calculations, with liberty to apply if a written agreement waiving the ineligibility exists under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
05-Aug-2024
Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF
-
05-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Sep-2023
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/2827/2024
The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple consolidated applications (Serial Nos. 902-1169) and set aside all arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which is void ab initio under the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings while excluding the period of the prior invalid proceedings from limitation calculations, with liberty to apply if a written agreement waiving the ineligibility exists under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts