THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE II COMMISSIONERATE vs M/S. ELECTROFORCE (INDIA) PVT. LTD. — CEXA/46/2015

Case under Central Excise & Salt Act Section 35G. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020245582014

Filing Number

CEXA/347/2014

Filing Date

27-Oct-2014

Registration No

CEXA/46/2015

Registration Date

18-Feb-2015

Judge

Arun Janba Kesarkar (Account Officer)

Coram

Arun Janba Kesarkar (Account Officer)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Excise & Salt Act Section 35G

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, THANE II COMMISSIONERATE

    Adv. THAKKER RUJU,APPELLANT,APPELLANT, APPELLANT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S. ELECTROFORCE (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Arun Janba Kesarkar (Account Officer)View PDF

    Summary: In CEXA/46/2015, the case was called for direction on 17 June 2026 before the Special Court (TORTS), Bombay. The appellant's counsel requested adjournment as the advocate on record was elevated to Senior Counsel and time was needed to obtain instructions regarding appointment of a new advocate. The court adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jun-2016

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi,hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. DharmadhikariView PDF

  4. 06-Jun-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Jun-2016

    For Admissionoriginal Side Matters

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi , Hon'ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari

  6. 29-Jan-2015
  7. 27-Oct-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. CEXA/46/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In CEXA/46/2015, the case was called for direction on 17 June 2026 before the Special Court (TORTS), Bombay. The appellant's counsel requested adjournment as the advocate on record was elevated to Senior Counsel and time was needed to obtain instructions regarding appointment of a new advocate. The court adjourned the matter to 24 June 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case