ORAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED vs PIRAMAL SUNTECK REALTY PVT. LTD. Advocate - Trilegal — COMS/3/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020245272024

Filing Number

COMS/24520/2024

Filing Date

03-Aug-2024

Registration No

COMS/3/2025

Registration Date

17-Jan-2025

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ORAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. SL Partners

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PIRAMAL SUNTECK REALTY PVT. LTD. Advocate - Trilegal

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY Case: COMS/3/2025 | Court: Bombay High Court | Date: June 8, 2026 Parties: ORAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) vs. PIRAMAL SUNTECK REALTY PVT. LTD. (Defendant) Outcome: Suit kept in abeyance; parties directed to pursue mediation under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act within 3 months (extendable by 2 months). Defendant's application to reject the suit dismissed; however, court found plaintiff failed to establish genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation requirement, noting 12-month delay between legal notice and suit filing demonstrates no urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. COMS/3/2025

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY Case: COMS/3/2025 | Court: Bombay High Court | Date: June 8, 2026 Parties: ORAM REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED (Plaintiff) vs. PIRAMAL SUNTECK REALTY PVT. LTD. (Defendant) Outcome: Suit kept in abeyance; parties directed to pursue mediation under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act within 3 months (extendable by 2 months). Defendant's application to reject the suit dismissed; however, court found plaintiff failed to establish genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation requirement, noting 12-month delay between legal notice and suit filing demonstrates no urgency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case