SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD. vs HASAN MOHD YASIN SHAIKH — N/747/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 22. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 26th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020243392023

Filing Number

N/24331/2023

Filing Date

31-Aug-2023

Registration No

N/747/2025

Registration Date

04-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

26-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 24-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 22

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Devendra Vitthal Nawadkar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HASAN MOHD YASIN SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 26-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. against Hasan Mohd Yasin Shaikh, declaring the arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally. Following a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside even at the execution stage on this ground. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the time period from the original arbitration invocation excluded from limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. N/747/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the execution application filed by Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. against Hasan Mohd Yasin Shaikh, declaring the arbitral award void-ab-initio because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally. Following a recent Supreme Court judgment, the court held that arbitral awards can be set aside even at the execution stage on this ground. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the time period from the original arbitration invocation excluded from limitation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case