Siemens Financial Services Private Limited INDIALAW LLP vs R V Glass Industries through Vijay Dhameeja — CARBP/756/2025

Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020243162025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

03-08-2025

Filing Number

CARBP/24314/2025

Filing Date

04-08-2025

Registration No

CARBP/756/2025

Registration Date

17-09-2025

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ARBITRATION ( 4 )

Sub-Category

Interim Relief ( 102 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9

Petitioner(s)

Siemens Financial Services Private Limited INDIALAW LLP

Respondent(s)

R V Glass Industries through Vijay Dhameeja

Ritu Dhameeja

Rajat Singhal

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

10-09-2025

Circulation Matters

12-09-2025

Circulation Matters

16-10-2025

Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34

24-03-2026

ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9

17-02-2026

ARBP-FOR HEARING AND FINAL DISPOSAL U/S 9

Orders

01-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

The Bombay High Court appointed Ms. Aanchal Singhania as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Siemens Financial Services and R V Glass Industries arising from their February 2024 agreement. The court disposed of the arbitration petition and application after interim measures were already executed (machinery seized and sold), with arbitrator fees to be shared equally by both parties and subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court appointed Ms. Aanchal Singhania as sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes between Siemens Financial Services and R V Glass Industries arising from their February 2024 agreement. The court disposed of the arbitration petition and application after interim measures were already executed (machinery seized and sold), with arbitrator fees to be shared equally by both parties and subject to the final award. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case