TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED vs NANDAMURI TRANSPORTERS — CARBP/341/2024
Case under Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 Section 9. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020242132024
e-Filing Number
01-08-2024
Filing Number
CARBP/24206/2024
Filing Date
01-Aug-2024
Registration No
CARBP/341/2024
Registration Date
02-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Category
ARBITRATION ( 4 )
Sub-Category
Extension of Arbitral Mandate ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.TATA MOTORS FINANCE LIMITED
Adv. I V Merchant
Respondent(s)
-
1.NANDAMURI TRANSPORTERS
-
2.NANDAMURI SRINIVAS
-
3.NANDAMURI SUREKHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
The Bombay High Court permitted Tata Motors Finance Limited to sell two hypothecated vehicles seized by the Court Receiver from the non-appearing respondents, with sale proceeds to be adjusted against outstanding dues. The court ordered the petitioner to bear all costs and responsibility for vehicle removal, and discharged the Court Receiver after payment of any incurred expenses within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Arbp-For Hearing And Final Disposal U/S 9
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
07-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
24-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
10-Nov-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
06-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
06-Oct-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
18-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
18-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Jul-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
02-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
02-Jul-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
05-May-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
05-May-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
07-Apr-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
07-Apr-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
07-Apr-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
07-Apr-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
28-Mar-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
17-Mar-2025
Ad-Interim Relief- Section Section 37/ Section 34
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
11-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
26-Feb-2025
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
25-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Feb-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
18-Feb-2025
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar Sundaresan
-
30-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF
-
19-Nov-2024
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
08-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
08-Oct-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. CARBP/341/2024
The Bombay High Court permitted Tata Motors Finance Limited to sell two hypothecated vehicles seized by the Court Receiver from the non-appearing respondents, with sale proceeds to be adjusted against outstanding dues. The court ordered the petitioner to bear all costs and responsibility for vehicle removal, and discharged the Court Receiver after payment of any incurred expenses within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts