AXIS BANK (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD.,) vs SANJAY JAGNARAYAN YADAV — EXA/62/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020241502021

Filing Number

EXA/24067/2021

Filing Date

20-Oct-2021

Registration No

EXA/62/2024

Registration Date

06-Jan-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AXIS BANK (FORMERLY KNOWN AS UTI BANK LTD.,)

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY JAGNARAYAN YADAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple arbitration applications and set aside all arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be raised at any stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods, though parties may apply for relief if they had a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Oct-2025

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing MasterView PDF

  4. 01-Oct-2025

    For Direction

    Mrs.Maheshwari Parkar, Taxing Master

  5. 20-Oct-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/62/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple arbitration applications and set aside all arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio and ineligibility can be raised at any stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time already spent excluded from limitation periods, though parties may apply for relief if they had a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case