SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD AARTI M KULKARNI vs AMIT KUMAR SHESHMANI DUBEY(BORROWER) AND ANR — EXA/266/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020241172022

Filing Number

EXA/24111/2022

Filing Date

27-Jul-2022

Registration No

EXA/266/2023

Registration Date

18-Feb-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO LTD AARTI M KULKARNI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.AMIT KUMAR SHESHMANI DUBEY(BORROWER) AND ANR

  2. 2.DILIP KUMAR SHIV DULAR SHUKLA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed Shriram Transport Finance Company's execution application and set aside the arbitral award, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International*. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there is a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla

  4. 27-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/266/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed Shriram Transport Finance Company's execution application and set aside the arbitral award, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International*. The court permitted the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there is a written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case