HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. vs KAMALA LAXMI ENTERPRISES AND 2 OTHERS — EXA/1163/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Sep-2019

CNR: HCBM020236802018

Filing Number

EXA/2268/2018

Filing Date

24-Aug-2018

Registration No

EXA/1163/2019

Registration Date

14-Nov-2019

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAMALA LAXMI ENTERPRISES AND 2 OTHERS

  2. 2.VINITA ANAND ACHARI

  3. 3.ANAND ACHARI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed HDB Financial Services Ltd.'s execution application, declaring the arbitral award passed by the sole arbitrator void-ab-initio because the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment establishing that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period from the original arbitration excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jan-2024

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

  4. 22-Oct-2019

    —View PDF

  5. 23-Sep-2019

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. MasterView PDF

  6. 23-Sep-2019

    For Rejection [Original Side Matters]

    Registrar(os)/Prothonotary and Sr. Master

  7. 24-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1163/2019

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed HDB Financial Services Ltd.'s execution application, declaring the arbitral award passed by the sole arbitrator void-ab-initio because the arbitrator's appointment was unilateral, relying on a recent Supreme Court judgment establishing that arbitral awards can be set aside at the execution stage on this ground. The court allowed the parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period from the original arbitration excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case