ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED vs SAMSOLITE PAINTS LIMITED AND 2 ORS. Advocate - archana singh, DEFENDANTS — COMIP/226/2015

Case under Trade & Trade Merchandise Marks Act Section ---. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 06th May 2026.

CNR: HCBM020235262014

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

12th June 2015

Filing Number

S/972/2014

Filing Date

08-10-2014

Registration No

COMIP/226/2015

Registration Date

23-02-2015

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

Trade & Trade Merchandise Marks Act Section ---

Petitioner(s)

ASIAN PAINTS LIMITED

Adv. G S HEGDE AND V A BHAGAT

Respondent(s)

SAMSOLITE PAINTS LIMITED AND 2 ORS. Advocate - archana singh, DEFENDANTS

SAMSOLITE PAINTS and CHEMICALS PVT. LTD.

SAMSOLITE PAINTS PVT. LTD.

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

12-06-2015

FOR DIRECTION [ORIGINAL SIDE MATTERS]

05-05-2026

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

04-05-2026

FIRST ON BOARD (FOB)

29-04-2026

FOR SETTLEMENT / CONSENT TERMS

29-04-2026

FOR SETTLEMENT / CONSENT TERMS

Orders

13-01-2015
08-09-2017
04-05-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHRI ARIF S. DOCTOR

Summary The Bombay High Court found that defendants Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Mansha Kumari willfully violated court orders by failing to appear (even virtually) and later filing false statements claiming hospitalization and caregiving duties as reasons. The court determined their excuses were baseless and their conduct amounted to mockery of court orders. While the court refrained from issuing a non-bailable warrant after defense counsel's assurance of their personal appearance on the next date, it made clear such contemptuous conduct would not be tolerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court found that defendants Mr. Sanjay Kumar and Ms. Mansha Kumari willfully violated court orders by failing to appear (even virtually) and later filing false statements claiming hospitalization and caregiving duties as reasons. The court determined their excuses were baseless and their conduct amounted to mockery of court orders. While the court refrained from issuing a non-bailable warrant after defense counsel's assurance of their personal appearance on the next date, it made clear such contemptuous conduct would not be tolerated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case