TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. vs SHREE VIJAYA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD — EXA/193/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020227682023

Filing Number

EXA/22760/2023

Filing Date

19-Aug-2023

Registration No

EXA/193/2025

Registration Date

20-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

    Adv. O M Gujar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHREE VIJAYA ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD

  2. 2.HARISHCHANDRA PRASAD RANGALA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including EXA/193/2025) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the court found void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the previous period from limitation calculations, unless an express written waiver existed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 19-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/193/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple matters (including EXA/193/2025) because the sole arbitrator was appointed unilaterally, which the court found void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, excluding the previous period from limitation calculations, unless an express written waiver existed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case