KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM vs SONU ARUN DEY — EXA/1834/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020224652022

Filing Number

EXA/22459/2022

Filing Date

13-Jul-2022

Registration No

EXA/1834/2024

Registration Date

12-Jul-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD. ACUMEN LAWYERS FIRM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONU ARUN DEY

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 13-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1834/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless parties had executed a written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case