SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES PVT LTD vs RAJESH KOTAK — EXA/2027/2016

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Dec-2017

CNR: HCBM020224612016

Filing Number

EXA/1985/2016

Filing Date

01-Sep-2016

Registration No

EXA/2027/2016

Registration Date

21-Nov-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES PVT LTD

    Adv. O M Gujar Law Chambers

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJESH KOTAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (including SBI Cards vs. Rajesh Kotak) where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent holding such appointments void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Dec-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,national Lok AdalatView PDF

  4. 09-Dec-2017

    For Orders [Original Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , National Lok Adalat

  5. 10-Nov-2017

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  6. 09-Sep-2017

    National Lok Adalat,hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. OkaView PDF

  7. 01-Sep-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2027/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (including SBI Cards vs. Rajesh Kotak) where the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International precedent holding such appointments void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior limitation period excluded, unless there was express written waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case