Bisleri International Private Limited vs Uday Thakur — IA/2337/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 27(2)and29(1)and(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020224452025

e-Filing Number

21-07-2025

Filing Number

IA/22442/2025

Filing Date

21-Jul-2025

Registration No

IA/2337/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 27(2)and29(1)and(2)
Copyright Act Section 51

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bisleri International Private Limited

    Adv. Vinod Bhagat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Uday Thakur

  2. 2.Sanju Ram

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court decreed Bisleri International Private Limited's Commercial IP Suit against defendants Uday Thakur and Sanju Ram based on a settlement agreement. The court accepted consent terms signed by both parties, granted relief as prayed in clauses (a)-(e) of the plaint, and ordered the plaintiff to pay the Court Receiver's costs within eight days. The Leave Petition was allowed as the dispute was settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Sep-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  4. 31-Jul-2025

    For Ad-Interim Relief

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  5. 30-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  6. 30-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 21-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/2337/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court decreed Bisleri International Private Limited's Commercial IP Suit against defendants Uday Thakur and Sanju Ram based on a settlement agreement. The court accepted consent terms signed by both parties, granted relief as prayed in clauses (a)-(e) of the plaint, and ordered the plaintiff to pay the Court Receiver's costs within eight days. The Leave Petition was allowed as the dispute was settled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case