Bisleri International Private Limited vs Uday Thakur — IA/2338/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 27(2)and29(1)&(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020220622025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

17-07-2025

Filing Number

IA/22060/2025

Filing Date

18-07-2025

Registration No

IA/2338/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

TRADE MARKS ACT Section 27(2)and29(1)&(2)
COPYRIGHT ACT Section 51

Petitioner(s)

Bisleri International Private Limited

Adv. Vinod Bhagat

Respondent(s)

Uday Thakur

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

30-07-2025

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF

31-07-2025

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF

18-09-2025

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Summary The Bombay High Court decreed the Commercial IP Suit filed by Bisleri International Private Limited against defendant Uday Thakur based on a settlement reached between the parties. The court accepted the consent terms signed by both parties and granted all relief sought in prayer clauses (a) through (e) of the plaint, with the plaintiff ordered to pay the Court Receiver's costs within eight days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court decreed the Commercial IP Suit filed by Bisleri International Private Limited against defendant Uday Thakur based on a settlement reached between the parties. The court accepted the consent terms signed by both parties and granted all relief sought in prayer clauses (a) through (e) of the plaint, with the plaintiff ordered to pay the Court Receiver's costs within eight days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case