MADHUBAN MOTORS PVT LTD vs MANMOHAN BHIMSAIN GOYAL — HCBM20219542024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 00. Next hearing: 21st January 2025.
CNR: HCBM020219542024
e-Filing Number
11-07-2024
Filing Number
IA/21947/2024
Filing Date
11-Jul-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 28-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MADHUBAN MOTORS PVT LTD
Adv. PARINAM LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.MANMOHAN BHIMSAIN GOYAL
-
2.KAVITA MANMOHAN GOYAL
Case History
-
21-Jan-2025
Next hearingPending
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
Case Summary: Madhuban Motors Pvt Ltd vs. Manmohan Bhimsain Goyal Outcome: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Commercial Execution Application (dated 23 April 2026) after finding the underlying arbitral award (18 March 2024) had been set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to unilateral arbitrator appointment. The court granted liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the limitation period from original arbitration invocation until award set-aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Jan-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
06-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
06-Jan-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
18-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
18-Nov-2024
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
01-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
01-Oct-2024
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
26-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
05-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
05-Aug-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jul-2024
Case filed
Case Summary: Madhuban Motors Pvt Ltd vs. Manmohan Bhimsain Goyal Outcome: The Bombay High Court dismissed the Commercial Execution Application (dated 23 April 2026) after finding the underlying arbitral award (18 March 2024) had been set aside under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 due to unilateral arbitrator appointment. The court granted liberty to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the limitation period from original arbitration invocation until award set-aside. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts