INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED vs CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS — IA/3220/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 22nd July 2026.

Next hearing 22-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020218882022

Filing Number

IA/21882/2022

Filing Date

08-Jul-2022

Registration No

IA/3220/2022

Registration Date

13-Jul-2022

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INTEGRO FINSERV PRIVATE LIMITED

    Adv. DS LAW

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CFM ASSET RECONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS

Case History

  1. 22-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Jul-2026

    Due Matters - Adjourned OS

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  3. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: IA 3220/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Integro Finserv Private Limited's interim application to be substituted as the Claimant/Decree Holder in place of CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited. The court recognized that through successive deed of assignments (L&T Finance to CFM in 2019, then CFM to Integro in February 2022), Integro had acquired all rights to the outstanding loans against the respondents. The court ordered the amendment be completed within four weeks and the amended application served on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 08-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/3220/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: IA 3220/2022 The Bombay High Court allowed Integro Finserv Private Limited's interim application to be substituted as the Claimant/Decree Holder in place of CFM Asset Reconstruction Private Limited. The court recognized that through successive deed of assignments (L&T Finance to CFM in 2019, then CFM to Integro in February 2022), Integro had acquired all rights to the outstanding loans against the respondents. The court ordered the amendment be completed within four weeks and the amended application served on respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case