SHRIRAM FIANANCE LIMITED (FORMELY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED) vs MOHD TUFAIL MOHD SIDDIQUE SHAIKH — EXA/506/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020217872023

Filing Number

EXA/21779/2023

Filing Date

08-Aug-2023

Registration No

EXA/506/2024

Registration Date

21-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FIANANCE LIMITED (FORMELY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED)

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHD TUFAIL MOHD SIDDIQUE SHAIKH

  2. 2.MOHD SALIM KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/506/2024 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the appointment void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitation periods excluded for the period already spent in the previous arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 08-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/506/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/506/2024 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in this batch of cases because the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed, rendering the appointment void ab initio under Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications, allowing parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time limitation periods excluded for the period already spent in the previous arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case