Bisleri International Private Limited vs Uday Thakur — COMIP/174/2026

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 27(1)and29(1)and(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM020216682025

CASE DISPOSED

e-Filing Number

14-07-2025

Filing Number

COMIP/21667/2025

Filing Date

16-07-2025

Registration No

COMIP/174/2026

Registration Date

27-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

TRADE MARKS ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Acts & Sections

TRADE MARKS ACT Section 27(1)and29(1)and(2)
COPYRIGHT ACT Section 51

Petitioner(s)

Bisleri International Private Limited

Adv. Vinod Bhagat

Respondent(s)

Uday Thakur

Sanju Ram

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

15-04-2026

AT 3.00 P.M.

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Case Summary The Bombay High Court decreed the Commercial IP Suit filed by Bisleri International Private Limited against Uday Thakur and Sanju Ram based on a settled compromise. The defendants appeared in person, verified their identities via Aadhaar cards, and submitted to the decree on all prayer clauses (a) through e) of the plaint. The Court Receiver was discharged, with all associated costs to be paid by the plaintiff within eight days, and the interim application and leave petition were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court decreed the Commercial IP Suit filed by Bisleri International Private Limited against Uday Thakur and Sanju Ram based on a settled compromise. The defendants appeared in person, verified their identities via Aadhaar cards, and submitted to the decree on all prayer clauses (a) through e) of the plaint. The Court Receiver was discharged, with all associated costs to be paid by the plaintiff within eight days, and the interim application and leave petition were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case