RAJENDRA KANAIYALAL SANGHAVI vs SONAL SANGHAVI ALIAS SONAL UDAY THAKKAR (PSEUDONYM ALIAS CRYSTAL) Advocate - Jayant Mohan Puranik — S/205/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: HCBM020216182025

Filing Number

S/21617/2025

Filing Date

16-Jul-2025

Registration No

S/205/2025

Registration Date

05-Aug-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 06-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJENDRA KANAIYALAL SANGHAVI

    Adv. HEMANT KENJALKAR,SANDEEP GURAV,SANDEEP GURAV, SHUBHAM B. CHOUDHAR,SANDEEP GURAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SONAL SANGHAVI ALIAS SONAL UDAY THAKKAR (PSEUDONYM ALIAS CRYSTAL) Advocate - Jayant Mohan Puranik

  2. 2.NOTION PRESS ALIAS NOTION PRESS.COM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: In case 15 S/205/2025, the court directed the plaintiff to issue a fresh Writ of Summons along with a copy of the amended plaint against defendants and file an affidavit of service by the next date. The case has been adjourned to 29.04.2026, with a warning that failing compliance with these directions will result in necessary orders being passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    For Direction

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad((Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

  5. 16-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. S/205/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In case 15 S/205/2025, the court directed the plaintiff to issue a fresh Writ of Summons along with a copy of the amended plaint against defendants and file an affidavit of service by the next date. The case has been adjourned to 29.04.2026, with a warning that failing compliance with these directions will result in necessary orders being passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case