BAJAJ FINANCE LTD vs MD SHAMIM SHAIKH — EXA/20/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 09th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020215452022

Filing Number

EXA/21539/2022

Filing Date

06-Jul-2022

Registration No

EXA/20/2025

Registration Date

06-Jan-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BAJAJ FINANCE LTD

    Adv. O M Gujar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MD SHAMIM SHAIKH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/20/2025 - Bajaj Finance Ltd vs. MD Shamim Shaikh The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this case due to unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the voided arbitration excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 06-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/20/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/20/2025 - Bajaj Finance Ltd vs. MD Shamim Shaikh The Bombay High Court set aside the arbitral award in this case due to unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all related execution and interim applications, but permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time spent in the voided arbitration excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case