HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED vs SHARON S DSOUZA — EXA/1456/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020214562022

Filing Number

EXA/21450/2022

Filing Date

05-Jul-2022

Registration No

EXA/1456/2023

Registration Date

20-Sep-2023

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHARON S DSOUZA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period already spent on the invalid arbitration excluded from the limitation period, unless there is express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 05-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1456/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed 190 consolidated applications and set aside all arbitral awards because the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed, following the Supreme Court's landmark decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period already spent on the invalid arbitration excluded from the limitation period, unless there is express written agreement waiving the ineligibility objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case