MOHAMMED NAZIM IBRAHIM SHAIKH AND 3 ORS. vs ALI HAJI KASAM AND CO. THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR AND 3 ORS. Advocate - Rajendra Rathod — COMS/25/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 30th July 2026.

Next hearing 30-Jul-2026

CNR: HCBM020212742022

Filing Number

COMS/21268/2022

Filing Date

04-Jul-2022

Registration No

COMS/25/2024

Registration Date

08-Mar-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

FOR DECLARATION GENERAL ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1
Indian Contract Act 1872

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMED NAZIM IBRAHIM SHAIKH AND 3 ORS.

    Adv. Diamondwala and Co

  2. 2.MOHAMMED SALEM IBRAHIM SHAIKH

  3. 3.REKAIYA MOHAMMED RIZWAN CHOWDHARI,

  4. 4.FARHANA REHAN SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ALI HAJI KASAM AND CO. THROUGH ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR AND 3 ORS. Advocate - Rajendra Rathod

  2. 2.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER MCGM

  3. 3.THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (BUILDING AND PROPOSALS) CITY II

  4. 4.THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER MCGM

Case History

  1. 30-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

    The Bombay High Court adjourned the interim application in this commercial suit to June 12, 2026. The court granted liberty to the applicants to file their affidavit with the Registry, and directed respondents to file any affidavit-in-reply before the next date with advance notice to plaintiffs. The respondents did not appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 28-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Somasekhar SundaresanView PDF

  5. 04-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. COMS/25/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court adjourned the interim application in this commercial suit to June 12, 2026. The court granted liberty to the applicants to file their affidavit with the Registry, and directed respondents to file any affidavit-in-reply before the next date with advance notice to plaintiffs. The respondents did not appear before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case