HDFC BANK LIMITED KISHOR CHALKE AND ASSOCIATES, MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR vs USHA DATTA WARKE — EXA/447/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020211552023

Filing Number

EXA/21147/2023

Filing Date

02-Aug-2023

Registration No

EXA/447/2024

Registration Date

13-Feb-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDFC BANK LIMITED KISHOR CHALKE AND ASSOCIATES, MEGHANA MILIND MURUDKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.USHA DATTA WARKE

  2. 2.DATTA SATAPPA WARKE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards in consolidated proceedings because the sole arbitrator in each case was appointed unilaterally, which the court found void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and related applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the limitation period tolled from the original invocation of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 02-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/447/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards in consolidated proceedings because the sole arbitrator in each case was appointed unilaterally, which the court found void ab initio following Supreme Court precedent. The court dismissed all execution and related applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the limitation period tolled from the original invocation of arbitration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case