SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD. SINGH MAHENDRA PRATAP vs NARESH MATTA — EXA/1410/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020210792025

Filing Number

EXA/21078/2025

Filing Date

11-Jul-2025

Registration No

EXA/1410/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI CARDS AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LTD. SINGH MAHENDRA PRATAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NARESH MATTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary of EXA/1410/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (in consolidated matters numbered 902-1151) after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which violates the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the previous limitation period excluded from the new timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. PatilView PDF

  4. 06-Jan-2026

    For Dismissal Under Rule 329

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil

  5. 11-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1410/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of EXA/1410/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards (in consolidated matters numbered 902-1151) after finding that the sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, which violates the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio, the court dismissed all related execution and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the previous limitation period excluded from the new timeline. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case