L AND T FINANCE LTD. vs KUSHAL H. MAJUKAR AND ANR. — EXA/2688/2015

Case under Code of Civil Procedure. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020210262015

Filing Number

EXA/1631/2015

Filing Date

30-Jul-2015

Registration No

EXA/2688/2015

Registration Date

09-Dec-2015

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.L AND T FINANCE LTD.

    Adv. Disha Karambar and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KUSHAL H. MAJUKAR AND ANR.

  2. 2.HANAMANT K. MAJUKAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (Serial Nos. 912-1035) involving L&T Finance Ltd. against Kushal H. Majukar and Hanamant K. Majukar, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent that such defects can be raised at any stage. The Court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 30-Jul-2015

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2688/2015

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases (Serial Nos. 912-1035) involving L&T Finance Ltd. against Kushal H. Majukar and Hanamant K. Majukar, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and therefore void ab initio, following Supreme Court precedent that such defects can be raised at any stage. The Court dismissed all connected execution and interim applications, while permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case