Jaiprakash Nigam vs Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division II, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate — HCBM20209672025

Case under Constitution of India Section Article 14 and Article 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020209672025

e-Filing Number

10-07-2025

Filing Number

WP/20964/2025

Filing Date

10-Jul-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

SERVICE TAX ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section Article 14 and Article 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jaiprakash Nigam

    Adv. SHASHANK AJAY MEHTA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Assistant Commissioner of CGST and Central Excise Division II, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate

  2. 2.The Principal Commissioner of GST and Central Excise, Mumbai East

  3. 3.The Union of India

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    The court order is not specific to the Jaiprakash Nigam case mentioned in the case details provided. Instead, this document is a batch rejection order for multiple writ petitions (WPL/19479/2025 through WPL/20964/2025) heard on 17th June 2026 by the Bombay High Court. The court gave petitioners a final two-week deadline to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes, with all petitions to stand rejected under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance if the objections are not addressed within that timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 10-Jul-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The court order is not specific to the Jaiprakash Nigam case mentioned in the case details provided. Instead, this document is a batch rejection order for multiple writ petitions (WPL/19479/2025 through WPL/20964/2025) heard on 17th June 2026 by the Bombay High Court. The court gave petitioners a final two-week deadline to remove office objections and file compliance praecipes, with all petitions to stand rejected under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance if the objections are not addressed within that timeframe. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case