PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs SANTEC CHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - Rayyan Nasir — HCBM20209522024

Case under Trade Marks Act Section 77. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.

CNR: HCBM020209522024

Next Hearing

01st July 2026

e-Filing Number

05-07-2024

Filing Number

IA/20946/2024

Filing Date

05-07-2024

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Acts & Sections

Trade Marks Act Section 77
Copy Right Act Section 77

Petitioner(s)

PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LIMITED

Adv. ANM Global

Respondent(s)

SANTEC CHEMICAL PRIVATE LIMITED Advocate - Rayyan Nasir

STC MARKETING

Adv. Rayyan Nasir

SHIHABUDHEEN

Adv. Rayyan Nasir

AR MARKETING SOLE PROPRIETOR RANEEJ THUMBONA

Adv. Rayyan Nasir

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

28-01-2025

FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION

13-02-2025

FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION

08-07-2024

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF(CIRCULATION)

21-08-2024

FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF(CIRCULATION)

12-09-2024

DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS

Orders

17-04-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the matter on 17th April 2026 due to paucity of time, with the next hearing scheduled for 01/07/2026. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues to operate until the next date. The case involved Pidilite Industries Limited's intellectual property rights suit against Santec Chemical Private Limited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court adjourned the matter on 17th April 2026 due to paucity of time, with the next hearing scheduled for 01/07/2026. Any ad-interim or interim relief previously granted continues to operate until the next date. The case involved Pidilite Industries Limited's intellectual property rights suit against Santec Chemical Private Limited. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case