MANGAL CREDIT AND FINCORP LIMITED vs MAMA ART — EXA/178/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020207482025

Filing Number

EXA/20747/2025

Filing Date

09-Jul-2025

Registration No

EXA/178/2026

Registration Date

09-Feb-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANGAL CREDIT AND FINCORP LIMITED

    Adv. P D JAIN AND CO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAMA ART

  2. 2.SONARAM MOTIJI KUMAWAT

  3. 3.KANTABEN SONARAM KUMAWAT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary of Case EXA/178/2026 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated matters where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, applying the Supreme Court's ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and related interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 09-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case EXA/178/2026 The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in consolidated matters where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, applying the Supreme Court's ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution applications and related interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time already spent excluded from limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case