JEHANGIR JAMSHED GUZDER MLS Vani and Associates vs Cyrus Jamshed Guzder Advocate - Maneksha and Sethna — IA/4835/2025

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 302. Disposed: --DISPOSED OFF on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020206042025

e-Filing Number

07-07-2025

Filing Number

IA/20603/2025

Filing Date

08-Jul-2025

Registration No

IA/4835/2025

Registration Date

26-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

Bench Type

Single

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 11-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 302

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JEHANGIR JAMSHED GUZDER MLS Vani and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Cyrus Jamshed Guzder Advocate - Maneksha and Sethna

  2. 2.Farokh Jamshed Guzder

    Adv. Maneksha and Sethna

  3. 3.Statira Farokh Wadia

    Adv. Maneksha and Sethna

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

    The Bombay High Court disposed of two interim applications in testamentary petitions between Jehangir Jamshed Guzder and Cyrus Jamshed Guzder, finding that the dispute had been amicably settled. The court accepted the consent terms filed by both parties as binding undertakings and consequently disposed of both interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  6. 02-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  7. 02-Feb-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  9. 07-Jan-2026

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  10. 08-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. Deshmukh

  12. 10-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Sharmila U. DeshmukhView PDF

  13. 10-Nov-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  15. 13-Oct-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  16. 16-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  17. 16-Sep-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  18. 09-Sep-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  19. 09-Sep-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  20. 26-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  21. 26-Aug-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  22. 19-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  23. 19-Aug-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  24. 11-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  25. 11-Aug-2025

    For Settlement / Consent Terms

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  26. 05-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  27. 05-Aug-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  28. 01-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  29. 01-Aug-2025

    For Direction

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  30. 23-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  31. 23-Jul-2025

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata

  32. 16-Jul-2025

    Hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF

  33. 16-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  34. 08-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. IA/4835/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of two interim applications in testamentary petitions between Jehangir Jamshed Guzder and Cyrus Jamshed Guzder, finding that the dispute had been amicably settled. The court accepted the consent terms filed by both parties as binding undertakings and consequently disposed of both interim applications. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case