HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. vs B V M TEXTILES AND 3 ORS. — EXA/133/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020205592021

Filing Number

EXA/20478/2021

Filing Date

09-Sep-2021

Registration No

EXA/133/2024

Registration Date

29-Jan-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HDB FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.

    Adv. SG Legal and Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.B V M TEXTILES AND 3 ORS.

  2. 2.PADMA LOCHAN MAHAPATRO

  3. 3.BHAGYALATA PRASHANT SAHU

  4. 4.SHREEPATI PRASHANT SAHU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of previous arbitration excluded from limitation, except where parties have express written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 06-Oct-2023

    Shri. S. B. Bhansali (Prothonotary Senior Master))View PDF

  5. 06-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/133/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the time period of previous arbitration excluded from limitation, except where parties have express written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case