SBI CARD AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LIMITED vs RAMILA JANI — EXA/1415/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020204952025

Filing Number

EXA/20494/2025

Filing Date

07-Jul-2025

Registration No

EXA/1415/2025

Registration Date

31-Jul-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section RULE 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SBI CARD AND PAYMENTS SERVICES LIMITED

    Adv. mahendra pratap singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAMILA JANI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    —View PDF

    Summary of Case EXA/1415/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters involving SBI Card and Payments Services Limited following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation periods, subject to any written waiver agreements under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 07-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1415/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case EXA/1415/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in consolidated matters involving SBI Card and Payments Services Limited following the Supreme Court's Bhadra International ruling that unilateral arbitrator appointments are void ab initio. The court dismissed execution applications and allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings, with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation periods, subject to any written waiver agreements under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case