Phoenix ARC Private Limited argus partners vs Future Brands Limited — HCBM20203662025
Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020203662025
e-Filing Number
05-07-2025
Filing Number
IA/20363/2025
Filing Date
05-Jul-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Coram
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 25-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Phoenix ARC Private Limited argus partners
Respondent(s)
-
1.Future Brands Limited
-
2.Future Entertainment Private Limited
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
Summary The High Court of Bombay rejected the defendants' preliminary objections and dismissed their plea to reject the plaint (suit filed by Phoenix ARC against Future Brands and Future Entertainment). The court held that while Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act mandates pre-institution mediation, the bar doesn't apply when urgent interim relief is genuinely contemplated. Since the plaintiff had pleaded urgent need for interim protection due to expiring trademark agreements secured against a ₹500+ crore outstanding debt, the suit could proceed without completing mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
01-Dec-2025
-For Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Objections To Be Removed
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
17-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
-For Orders
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
14-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
14-Oct-2025
For Orders (Due Matters)
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
07-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
07-Oct-2025
For Hearing
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse
-
29-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF
-
29-Sep-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
17-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
17-Sep-2025
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal Jain
-
10-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Jitendra Shantilal JainView PDF
-
10-Sep-2025
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze Pooniwalla
-
03-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Firdosh Phiroze PooniwallaView PDF
-
03-Sep-2025
At 1.00 P.M.
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
02-Sep-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
02-Sep-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
02-Sep-2025
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
26-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
26-Aug-2025
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
25-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
25-Aug-2025
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
25-Aug-2025
High On Board (Hob)
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
22-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Due Matters - Adjourned OS
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
20-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
08-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
06-Aug-2025
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
25-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
18-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
18-Jul-2025
For Ad-Interim Relief
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla
-
11-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice R. I. ChaglaView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jul-2025
Case filed
Summary The High Court of Bombay rejected the defendants' preliminary objections and dismissed their plea to reject the plaint (suit filed by Phoenix ARC against Future Brands and Future Entertainment). The court held that while Section 12-A of the Commercial Courts Act mandates pre-institution mediation, the bar doesn't apply when urgent interim relief is genuinely contemplated. Since the plaintiff had pleaded urgent need for interim protection due to expiring trademark agreements secured against a ₹500+ crore outstanding debt, the suit could proceed without completing mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts