RUMA MADAN KOLEY vs MADAN GADADHAR KOLEY DECEASED — JOT/228/2024
Case under Indian Succession Act Section 278. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF on 25th March 2025.
CNR: HCBM020202492024
e-Filing Number
28-06-2024
Filing Number
JOT/20243/2024
Filing Date
29-Jun-2024
Registration No
JOT/228/2024
Registration Date
24-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Coram
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
25-Mar-2025
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OFF
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RUMA MADAN KOLEY
Adv. PRAKASH DUBE AND ASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.MADAN GADADHAR KOLEY DECEASED
-
2.BIMAL GADADHAR KOLEY DECEASED
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF
In this testamentary petition, the Bombay High Court directed Union Bank of India to forcibly open locker No. A-GA484 after the petitioner Ruma Madan Koley misplaced the keys, to enable inventory as previously ordered. The court mandated that an appropriate inventory be conducted and submitted to the Department for further action, with all expenses for breaking open the locker to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2025
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF
-
25-Mar-2025
Judges Order
Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor
-
29-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. JOT/228/2024
In this testamentary petition, the Bombay High Court directed Union Bank of India to forcibly open locker No. A-GA484 after the petitioner Ruma Madan Koley misplaced the keys, to enable inventory as previously ordered. The court mandated that an appropriate inventory be conducted and submitted to the Department for further action, with all expenses for breaking open the locker to be borne by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts