VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER Advocate - GP OS — HCBM20202312025

Case under Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Next hearing 17-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020202312025

Filing Number

WP/20228/2025

Filing Date

04-Jul-2025

Judge

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Coram

Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LOCAL BODY MATTERS OTHER THAN ELECTION, LABOUR AND SERVICE ( 61 )

Sub-Category

Municipal Corporation ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Municipal Corporation Act Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VILLAYATI RAM MITTAL

    Adv. Adv Mohit Sant

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH GOVT. PLEADER Advocate - GP OS

  2. 2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GRT MUMBAI THROUGH ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GRT MUMBAI THROUGH ITS ADDI MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER CITY

  4. 4.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GRT MUMBAI THROUGH ITS DY CHIEF ENGINEER ( IMPROVEMNET )

  5. 5.GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE / INTERNAL PROCUREMENT REDRESSAL COMMITTEE

  6. 6.YM AND MAKEWISE REALTY LLP

    Adv. SHARAD BHAGUNATH WAKCHOURE

  7. 7.MAZGAON TALWADI CHS (PROPOSED)

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)View PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Bombay issued an order on 17th June 2026 directing multiple petitioners to cure office objections in their petitions and file compliance documents within two weeks. Petitions that fail to comply with these procedural requirements will be rejected under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    For Rejection Under Rule 986

    Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)

  4. 04-Jul-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Bombay issued an order on 17th June 2026 directing multiple petitioners to cure office objections in their petitions and file compliance documents within two weeks. Petitions that fail to comply with these procedural requirements will be rejected under O.S.Rule 986 for non-compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case