OM NAGAR C.H.S. FEDERATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN K.K.R.MOHAN vs TRISHALA BHOJRAJ KARKERA Advocate - Bhate — S/319/2025
Case under Urban Land (ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act Section 1. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020200962024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
S/20088/2024
Filing Date
27-06-2024
Registration No
S/319/2025
Registration Date
28-10-2025
Judge
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Coram
Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
OTHER ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
OM NAGAR C.H.S. FEDERATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN K.K.R.MOHAN
Adv. Drupad Sopan Patil,Srushti Satyavan Chalke ,Srushti Satyavan Chalke , ,Srushti Satyavan Chalke
Respondent(s)
TRISHALA BHOJRAJ KARKERA Advocate - Bhate
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. A. H. Laddhad(Prothonotary Senior Master)
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS
FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF
INTERIM APPLICATION
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-07-2025 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 24-07-2025 | DUE MATTERS - ADJOURNED OS |
| 21-08-2025 | FOR AD-INTERIM RELIEF |
| 24-09-2025 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 15-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
Summary: In Suit No. S/319/2025, the case was called for directions on 15th April 2026. The court directed the Plaintiff to serve the Defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an Affidavit of service before the next date (24.06.2026), failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 87. The Plaintiff was granted liberty to serve Defendants through all modes including service upon their Advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Suit No. S/319/2025, the case was called for directions on 15th April 2026. The court directed the Plaintiff to serve the Defendants with a Writ of Summons and file an Affidavit of service before the next date (24.06.2026), failing which the suit will be dismissed for non-compliance with O.S. Rule 87. The Plaintiff was granted liberty to serve Defendants through all modes including service upon their Advocates. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts