SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FOREMELY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.) vs CHARISTOPHER WILSON FERRO — EXA/285/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020200852024

Filing Number

EXA/20235/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

EXA/285/2026

Registration Date

07-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED (FOREMELY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LTD.)

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHARISTOPHER WILSON FERRO

  2. 2.RAJESH ONEILL PHILIP DSILVA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    —View PDF

    The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases involving Shriram Finance Limited against Christopher Wilson Ferro and Rajesh Oneill Philip D'Silva, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/285/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside arbitral awards in multiple cases involving Shriram Finance Limited against Christopher Wilson Ferro and Rajesh Oneill Philip D'Silva, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and void ab initio. The court dismissed all execution and interim applications, permitting parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the prior arbitration period excluded from limitation calculations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case