SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED vs GOUTAM RAY AND ANR — EXA/352/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM020200792022
Filing Number
EXA/20073/2022
Filing Date
24-Jun-2022
Registration No
EXA/352/2025
Registration Date
07-Feb-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
EXECUTION ( 15 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURYODAY SMALL FINANCE BANK LIMITED
Adv. GNP Legal
Respondent(s)
-
1.GOUTAM RAY AND ANR
-
2.BANDANA SUBHASH BEPARI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, unless there is express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja
-
12-Nov-2024
Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF
-
24-Jun-2022
Case filed
Registration No. EXA/352/2025
The Bombay High Court set aside all arbitral awards in these consolidated matters, finding that the sole arbitrators were unilaterally appointed in violation of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Following the Supreme Court's decision in Bhadra International, the court dismissed all execution applications and interim applications. The parties are permitted to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the limitation period excluded, unless there is express written agreement waiving the arbitrator's ineligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts