SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD. vs RAJLAXMI TRAVELS — EXA/2293/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 15th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020200702024

Filing Number

EXA/20063/2024

Filing Date

27-Jun-2024

Registration No

EXA/2293/2024

Registration Date

28-Aug-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

15-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 25-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRIRAM FINANCE LIMITED FORMERLY KNOWN AS SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD.

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAJLAXMI TRAVELS

  2. 2.SUJIT KUMAR KRISHNA PILLAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications and set aside arbitral awards in matters involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio and defects can be raised at any stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded and allowed exceptions only where written agreements expressly waive ineligibility under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 27-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2293/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed all applications and set aside arbitral awards in matters involving unilateral arbitrator appointments, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Bhadra International that such appointments are void ab initio and defects can be raised at any stage. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the previous limitation period excluded and allowed exceptions only where written agreements expressly waive ineligibility under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case