RITE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — WP/2631/2023
Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020197772023
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
WP/19769/2023
Filing Date
19-07-2023
Registration No
WP/2631/2023
Registration Date
01-09-2023
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RITE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. VIDHII PARTNERS
GUMPHA DARSHAN (A AND B) CHSL
Respondent(s)
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. BMC
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. BMC
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE A.S. GADKARI , HON'BLE JUSTICE KAMAL KHATA
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
FOR CIRCULATION
-FOR DIRECTIONS
FOR DIRECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-09-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 21-08-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 06-09-2023 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 05-05-2026 | -FOR DIRECTIONS |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR DIRECTION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim relief. The court noted that the BMC's Assistant Assessor had three times changed the outstanding property tax amount within two months (Rs.18,70,424; Rs.26,27,601; Rs.35,54,816), finding prima facie that the officer lacked clarity on the amount due or was harassing the petitioner. The petition raises arguable questions warranting relief under prayer clauses (f) and (g). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim relief. The court noted that the BMC's Assistant Assessor had three times changed the outstanding property tax amount within two months (Rs.18,70,424; Rs.26,27,601; Rs.35,54,816), finding prima facie that the officer lacked clarity on the amount due or was harassing the petitioner. The petition raises arguable questions warranting relief under prayer clauses (f) and (g). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts