RITE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI — WP/2631/2023
Case under Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act Section 226. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM020197772023
Filing Number
WP/19769/2023
Filing Date
19-Jul-2023
Registration No
WP/2631/2023
Registration Date
01-Sep-2023
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RITE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED
Adv. VIDHII PARTNERS
-
2.GUMPHA DARSHAN (A AND B) CHSL
Respondent(s)
-
1.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
-
2.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. BMC
-
3.MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
Adv. BMC
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim relief. The court noted that the BMC's Assistant Assessor had three times changed the outstanding property tax amount within two months (Rs.18,70,424; Rs.26,27,601; Rs.35,54,816), finding prima facie that the officer lacked clarity on the amount due or was harassing the petitioner. The petition raises arguable questions warranting relief under prayer clauses (f) and (g). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
-For Directions
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
30-Apr-2026
For Direction
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
23-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
23-Apr-2026
-Due Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
16-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
16-Apr-2026
-Admission
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari , Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata
-
09-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari,hon'ble Justice Kamal KhataView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri
-
10-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
08-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
08-Dec-2025
Due Admission - 1
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe
-
28-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF
-
08-Feb-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
08-Feb-2024
For Direction
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
05-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
05-Jan-2024
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
06-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
06-Nov-2023
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
12-Oct-2023
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
12-Oct-2023
At 2.30 P.M.
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
06-Sep-2023
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
06-Sep-2023
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
06-Sep-2023
For Circulation
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata , Hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel
-
21-Aug-2023
Hon'ble Justice Kamal Khata,hon'ble Shri Justice G.S. PatelView PDF
-
21-Aug-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Jul-2023
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil,hon'ble Shri Justice Sunil B. ShukreView PDF
-
19-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. WP/2631/2023
The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and granted interim relief. The court noted that the BMC's Assistant Assessor had three times changed the outstanding property tax amount within two months (Rs.18,70,424; Rs.26,27,601; Rs.35,54,816), finding prima facie that the officer lacked clarity on the amount due or was harassing the petitioner. The petition raises arguable questions warranting relief under prayer clauses (f) and (g). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts