Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructure Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES vs Union of India Through the Secretary — WP/2608/2025
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act Section Sec65. Next hearing: 29th July 2026.
CNR: HCBM020197592025
Next Hearing
29th July 2026
e-Filing Number
01-07-2025
Filing Number
WP/19758/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
WP/2608/2025
Registration Date
11-07-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Neelkanth Mansions and Infrastructure Private Limited UBR LEGAL ADVOCATES
Respondent(s)
Union of India Through the Secretary
State of Maharashtra
The Assistant Commissioner Circle D, GST Audit II
The Superintendent of CGST Group 14, GST Audit II
The Additional Commissioner CGST Audit II
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM
FOR CIRCULATION
DUE ADMISSION - 1
AT 3.00 P.M.
HIGH ON BOARD (HOB)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-12-2025 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 29-07-2026 | DUE ADMISSION - 1 |
| 13-02-2026 | AT 3.00 P.M. |
| 18-02-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD (HOB) |
Orders
SUMMARY OF WP/2608/2025 (NEELKANTH MANSIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.) Case Status: Petitions DISMISSED with proceedings referred to larger bench for consideration of substantive legal questions. Key Issue: Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 are permissible or constitute jurisdictional overreach. Order Details: - The Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court precedents on consolidated notices - While bound by the Bombay High Court coordinate bench decision in *Milroc Good Earth Developers* (which disallowed consolidated notices), the court identified significant legal issues requiring larger bench consideration - The Supreme Court's dismissal of the SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (which upheld consolidated notices) was treated as binding law under Article 141 of the Constitution - Current interim orders continue till the larger bench decides Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73/74(10) limitation provisions control Section 73/74(1) notice issuance authority 2. Whether Section 73/74(10) *per se* prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 (curing defects) on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc's* prohibition on clubbing years states correct law 5. Legal position following Supreme Court's *Mathur Polymers* order This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY OF WP/2608/2025 (NEELKANTH MANSIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.) Case Status: Petitions DISMISSED with proceedings referred to larger bench for consideration of substantive legal questions. Key Issue: Whether consolidated/bunched show-cause notices covering multiple financial years under Sections 73/74 of the CGST Act, 2017 are permissible or constitute jurisdictional overreach. Order Details: - The Division Bench (Justices G.S. Kulkarni and Aarti Sathe) found conflicting High Court precedents on consolidated notices - While bound by the Bombay High Court coordinate bench decision in *Milroc Good Earth Developers* (which disallowed consolidated notices), the court identified significant legal issues requiring larger bench consideration - The Supreme Court's dismissal of the SLP in *Mathur Polymers* (which upheld consolidated notices) was treated as binding law under Article 141 of the Constitution - Current interim orders continue till the larger bench decides Five Questions Referred to Larger Bench: 1. Whether Section 73/74(10) limitation provisions control Section 73/74(1) notice issuance authority 2. Whether Section 73/74(10) *per se* prohibits consolidated notices for multiple years 3. Effect of Section 160 (curing defects) on consolidated proceedings 4. Whether *Milroc's* prohibition on clubbing years states correct law 5. Legal position following Supreme Court's *Mathur Polymers* order This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts