PRATIKSHA FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST vs FULCRUMSEC, — HCBM20196952026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Next hearing 12-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM020196952026

Filing Number

IA/19695/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Coram

Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

Bench Type

Single

Category

SUITS ( 38 )

Sub-Category

OTHER ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1
Specific Relief Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRATIKSHA FOUNDATION CHARITABLE TRUST

    Adv. DSK LEGAL

  2. 2.WITTY EDUCATION PRIVATE LIMITED

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FULCRUMSEC,

  2. 2.GOOGLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

  3. 3.GOOGLE LLC

  4. 4.PROTON AG

  5. 5.ASHOK KUMAR/ JOHN DOE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. DoctorView PDF

    Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted ex parte interim relief to Pratiksha Foundation Charitable Trust and Witty Education Private Limited against FulcrumSec and Google entities. The applicants' educational databases containing sensitive student information—including medical and mental health details, location data, and parental income—were hacked; the hacker demanded USD 750,000 ransom and began disclosing confidential information to parents. Justice Arif S. Doctor approved interim relief under prayer clauses (a), (c-1), and (c-2), finding the threat to child safety grave and pressing. The case stands adjourned to July 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    At 3.00 P.M.

    Hon'ble Justice Shri Arif S. Doctor

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Bombay High Court granted ex parte interim relief to Pratiksha Foundation Charitable Trust and Witty Education Private Limited against FulcrumSec and Google entities. The applicants' educational databases containing sensitive student information—including medical and mental health details, location data, and parental income—were hacked; the hacker demanded USD 750,000 ransom and began disclosing confidential information to parents. Justice Arif S. Doctor approved interim relief under prayer clauses (a), (c-1), and (c-2), finding the threat to child safety grave and pressing. The case stands adjourned to July 1, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case