SARJUDEVI KANTA GUPTA vs DY. COLLECTOR, WESTERN SUBURBS, (SPECIAL CELL) SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY, — HCBM20196222026
Case under Slum Areas (Improvement Clearance and Redevelopment) (Amendment) Act (Maharashtra) Section 226. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
CNR: HCBM020196222026
Filing Number
WP/19622/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
DEVELOPEMENT PERMISSION ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Original
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SARJUDEVI KANTA GUPTA
Adv. Ankit Sanjay Dubey
Respondent(s)
-
1.DY. COLLECTOR, WESTERN SUBURBS, (SPECIAL CELL) SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY,
-
2.SEVEN FIRE FLIES PRODUCTION LLP
-
3.OM SHRI SAI SRA CHS (PROP) THRU ADMINISTRATOR, SHANKAR SHELAR
-
4.COMPETENT AUTHORITY-3 SLUM REHABILITATION AUTHORITY,
-
5.APEX GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL COMMITTEE
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
22-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik,hon'ble Shri Justice S. M. ModakView PDF
Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 19622 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, petitioner Sarjudevi Kanta Gupta challenged actions by the Deputy Collector, Western Suburbs (Special Cell), Slum Rehabilitation Authority, and other respondents. The court found the case papers were not on file and directed the office to trace them. The petition was adjourned to 22 June 2026, and the petitioner was permitted to file two copies of the petition on record in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 19622 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, petitioner Sarjudevi Kanta Gupta challenged actions by the Deputy Collector, Western Suburbs (Special Cell), Slum Rehabilitation Authority, and other respondents. The court found the case papers were not on file and directed the office to trace them. The petition was adjourned to 22 June 2026, and the petitioner was permitted to file two copies of the petition on record in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts