SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE vs PUNAM V SHARMA AND ANR — EXA/2251/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020196172025

Filing Number

EXA/19616/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

EXA/2251/2025

Registration Date

07-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITED NARAYAN R. AWATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUNAM V SHARMA AND ANR

  2. 2.VINAY PUSHPRAJ SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    View PDF

    Case Summary: EXA/2251/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time exclusions for the period already spent in the invalid proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2251/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: EXA/2251/2025 The Bombay High Court set aside multiple arbitral awards and dismissed execution applications after finding that sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following Supreme Court precedent that such appointments are void ab initio. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with time exclusions for the period already spent in the invalid proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case