INDUSIND BANK LTD. vs SANJAY DAYARAM SAWDE S/O. DAYARAM SAWDE — EXA/2859/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 09th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020196052024

Filing Number

EXA/19599/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

EXA/2859/2024

Registration Date

24-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

09-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 10-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LTD.

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANJAY DAYARAM SAWDE S/O. DAYARAM SAWDE

  2. 2.DAYARAM NINAJI SAWADE S/O. NINAJI SAWADE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in numerous cases where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period of prior arbitration excluded from limitation, except where parties had executed written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/2859/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed multiple applications and set aside arbitral awards in numerous cases where sole arbitrators were appointed unilaterally, following the Supreme Court's decision in *Bhadra International* that such appointments are void ab initio. The court allowed parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings with the period of prior arbitration excluded from limitation, except where parties had executed written agreements waiving objections under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case