INDUSIND BANK LTD. vs SANGEETA SHAMBHU — EXA/1059/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2). Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OFF on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM020195982024

Filing Number

EXA/19592/2024

Filing Date

24-Jun-2024

Registration No

EXA/1059/2025

Registration Date

14-May-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

Bench Type

Single

Category

EXECUTION ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Original

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OFF

Last updated 07-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Rule 11 (2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.INDUSIND BANK LTD.

    Adv. adv amol shinde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SANGEETA SHAMBHU

  2. 2.VISHAL CHANDRASHEKHAR SHAMBU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay AhujaView PDF

    The Bombay High Court dismissed all 190 serial applications and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period from the original arbitration invocation till the judgment date from the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Dismissal in view of decision in Bhadra International Pvt. Ltd. V/s Airports Authority of India

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay Ahuja

  4. 24-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. EXA/1059/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court dismissed all 190 serial applications and set aside the respective arbitral awards, finding that the sole arbitrator's appointment was unilateral and thus void ab initio, following the Supreme Court's precedent in Bhadra International. The court permitted parties to initiate fresh arbitration proceedings in accordance with law, excluding the time period from the original arbitration invocation till the judgment date from the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case